Crumpler wrote: ↑Wed Sep 20, 2023 8:56 am
What about those stabilizing bars?
Not to use Carl as an example but I think he marketed a moly bar that ran from the forward lower control arm housing, side to side to make frame stiffer? Real thing or Kool-aid?
It’s real. It’s similar to making the front sway bar stiffer.
And that will … ?
You get to a point with stiffer springs and sway bars where the chassis *becomes* the spring.
A floppy, bendy chassis certainly limits what you can make a suspension do. The problem is that it’s a multi-variable system: you can’t change just one thing and drag a 1972 suspension/chassis design into the 21st century.
On other hand, *nothing* you can do to a suspension will magically turn bicycle tires into sticky rollers. You are ultimately, with suspension “sophistication”, just attempting to maximize the ultimate potential grip of tires under a variety of loading conditions on several axes. So… bigger front tires would be my first thought.
I’m not tellin’ya not to trip on the sway bar and fall down the suspension Rabbit Hole. Just’sayin’ there are a lot of bumps in the hole on the way to Wonderland, Alice.
That written… where does it hurt most? Under braking? Under acceleration? Mid-corner?
Hanlon’s Razor: Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Heinlein’s Corollary: Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
The Reddit Conjecture: Sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice.
Worf’s Razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which is adequately explained by laziness.
Worf’s Identity: Sufficiently advanced laziness is indistinguishable from stupidity
Worf's Law: Once you've mitigated risk from stupidity and laziness in your endeavors, failure is usually the result of insufficient imagination.
My 928 Inspection Guide