- By wsh
- By jschiller
- By h2pmr
- By 911KöniginBuilt to last
Why Would you Settle for Less when you can have More? Do not let other Authors Fool you with Empty Marketing Keywords. FLATBOOTS is what you Deserve. Built to last, Built from Scratch, Nothing Less.
Read moreForum layout is now fixed. If it hasn't reverted back to original form for you, delete your browser cache and you should see it fixed.
- Tue May 11, 2021 12:40 pm
#79332
I like it.
Formerly SeanR on RL
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1514018128869499/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1514018128869499/
- Thu May 13, 2021 1:53 pm
#79849
It sort of reminds me of the Trans-Am 944's, if a bit more contemporary.
A car that looks like that needs to have 500+HP to back it up, I think
A car that looks like that needs to have 500+HP to back it up, I think
Scott at Team Harco liked this
- Mon Jun 14, 2021 10:45 pm
#85421
I’ll challenge that premise... I am pretty well versed in building 951’s and if you think 500hp is “very doable”, even at the crank, then you and I have very different definitions of the word doable. Lol. Can it be done? Yes, but it won’t be very useable or last very long, IMO. I’d take a 951 with 350 ftlbs of torque over one with 500peak hp any day.
Following the path of least resistance to the lowest common denominator since 1961... My pronouns are “curmudgeon”, “geezer” and “I don’t give a shit what yours are”. "Designed by clowns who are in turn supervised by monkeys" doesn't apply to just Boeing
- Tue Jun 15, 2021 11:57 am
#85480
Yeah, never going to get 500 reliable hp out of a 951 engine without a LOT of money and knowledge. I think 350-400 is doable, but anything beyond that and the conversation should shift to a different power plant, one with more displacement. LS swaps seem to make the most sense for building a bad ass 944 variant.